Compressive Strength and Economic Evaluation of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate by Recycled Aggregate

Authors

  • Abdul Awol Rabby Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-771X
  • Imon Hasan Bhuiyan Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4172-0014
  • Uzzal Al Aziz Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author
  • Md Hasan Imam Siddique Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author
  • Md.Al Amin Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author
  • Abhijit Nath Abhi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Dhaka Internaational University, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8385-6775

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70028/dcea.v2i2.65

Keywords:

Aggregate Replacement Ratio, Cost-Effective Concrete, Compressive Strength, Recycled Aggregate Concrete, Sustainable Concrete

Abstract

The depletion of natural aggregates and the rising volume of construction and demolition waste have made sustainable alternatives in concrete production essential. Recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) helps reduce landfill use and reliance on natural resources, but its variable quality raises concerns about structural reliability. Therefore, evaluating the balance between mechanical performance and economic feasibility is crucial for promoting sustainable construction. In this study, concrete mixes were designed with varying RCA replacement levels (0%, 50%, 70%, and 100%) compared to natural coarse aggregate (NCA). A controlled mix proportion of 1:1.5:3 (cement:sand:aggregate) with a water–cement ratio of 0.5 and 1% superplasticizer was employed. To ensure consistency, aggregates were classified into 19 mm (40%), 12.5 mm (30%), and 9.5 mm (30%) gradations. Cylindrical specimens (100 × 200 mm) were cast and cured, followed by compressive strength testing at 7, 14, and 28 days in accordance with ASTM C39. The total material cost for each mix was also computed on a per-cubic-meter basis to assess economic implications alongside strength performance. The results highlight a clear strength–cost trade-off. The control mix (100% NCA) achieved 26.5 MPa at 28 days, while the 50% RCA mix showed only a 3.92% reduction (25.5 MPa) with 18.4% lower cost. At 70% RCA, compressive strength dropped by 10.42% (24 MPa) with a 28.29% cost reduction, whereas 100% RCA replacement resulted in a severe 59.63% strength loss (16.5 MPa) despite maximum cost savings (49.07%). These findings establish 50% RCA + 50% NCA as the most rational compromise, offering structural adequacy with substantial cost efficiency, while also reinforcing RCA’s role in sustainable construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Marzouk and S. Azab, “Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 82, pp. 41–49, 2014, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.015

M. S. Meddah, “Recycled aggregates in concrete production: engineering properties and environmental impact.” MATEC Web Conf. vol. 101, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710105021

A. De Luca, L. Chen, and K. Gharehbaghi, “Sustainable utilization of recycled aggregates: robust construction and demolition waste reduction strategies,” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 666–682, Oct. 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2020-0029

S. Yehia, K. Helal, A. Abusharkh, A. Zaher, and H. Istaitiyeh, “Strength and Durability Evaluation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Int J Concr Struct Mater, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 219–239, Jun. 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40069-015-0100-0

M. Yunus, Y. Karim, Z. Khan, M. S. Alsoufi, and “ A Review, “A Review on Recycled Aggregates for the Construction Industry,” American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-4-1-5

M. Marvila, P. de Matos, E. Rodríguez, S. N. Monteiro, and A. R. G. de Azevedo, “Recycled Aggregate: A Viable Solution for Sustainable Concrete Production,” Aug. 01, 2022, MDPI. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155276

F. Ma, A. Sha, R. Lin, Y. Huang, and C. Wang, “Greenhouse gas emissions from asphalt pavement construction: A case study in China,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar. 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030351

J. Vrijders and J. Desmyter, “Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in several countries,” RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports, vol. 8, pp. 37–173, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4908-5_3

G. R. Robinson, W. D. Menzie, and H. Hyun, “Recycling of construction debris as aggregate in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA,” in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Oct. 2004, pp. 275–294. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.006

M. A. Khalaf, C. C. Ban, and M. Ramli, “The constituents, properties and application of heavyweight concrete: A review,” Aug. 10, 2019, Elsevier Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.146

H. Guo et al., “Durability of recycled aggregate concrete – A review,” Cem Concr Compos, vol. 89, pp. 251–259, May 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.008

S. Ismail and M. Ramli, “Mechanical strength and drying shrinkage properties of concrete containing treated coarse recycled concrete aggregates,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 68, pp. 726–739, Oct. 2014, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.058

M. S. Alam et al., “Effect of sand types and mixing procedures on the physical and mechanical properties behavior on the mortar and concrete in Bangladesh,” Next Research, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 100244, Jun. 2025, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.NEXRES.2025.100244

O. Joshua et al., “Construction Research Congress 2018 582 Downloaded from ascelibrary.”

B. L. Damineli, M. Quattrone, S. C. Angulo, M. E. S. Taqueda, and V. M. John, “Rapid method for measuring the water absorption of recycled aggregates,” Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4069–4084, Oct. 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0773-5

N. N. Gerges, C. A. Issa, and S. Fawaz, “Effect of construction joints on the splitting tensile strength of concrete,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 3, pp. 83–91, Dec. 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2015.07.001

S. J. Woo, J. M. Yang, H. Lee, and H. K. Kwon, “Comparison of properties of 3d-printed mortar in air vs. Underwater,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 19, Oct. 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195888

K. Sobhan, L. Gonzalez, and D. V. Reddy, “Durability of a pavement foundation made from recycled aggregate concrete subjected to cyclic wet–dry exposure and fatigue loading,” Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2271–2284, Jun. 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0648-9

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Compressive Strength and Economic Evaluation of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate by Recycled Aggregate. (2025). Disaster in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2(2), Pp. 145-158. https://doi.org/10.70028/dcea.v2i2.65

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.