Experimental Investigation of the Ratio Between the Tensile Strength and Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70028/dcea.v2i2.55Keywords:
Rebar, Yield stress, TS/YS Ratio, Tensile Strength, Universal Testing MachineAbstract
Steel is an iron alloy with additional carbon to improve its strength and fracture resistance. Reinforcing steel, also known as rebar, is a steel bar that’s added to concrete to strengthen it. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the tensile strength-to-yield stress (TS/YS) ratio and its implications for the ductility and performance of steel in structural applications, with a particular focus on earthquake-resistant design. Ductility is essential for preventing structural collapse during extreme events. The (TS/YS) ratio is crucial for structural systems expected to endure strain-hardening range stresses. The relevance of this ratio in the design of buildings and bridges is emphasized, especially regarding ductile elements and stress concentrations. Building codes, including the Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC 2020) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318M-14, mandate that the (TS/YS) ratio exceed 1.25, and guarantee adequate inelastic rotation capacity in structural members. This experimental investigation broadly evaluates Grades 40, 60, and 72.5 rebars with different diameters of 12 mm, 16 mm, and 20 mm, providing insights into the variation of TS/YS ratios across a broad strength spectrum to ensure structural reliability and optimize material selection. The results show that despite of higher yield stress of 72.5 grade bar (86 ksi), 60 grade bar shows better TS/YS ratio of 1.55. Elongation rates remained within acceptable limits for both 60 and 40 grade bar which is 21%, although the 72.5-grade rebar exhibited slightly lower elongation. Displacement-controlled tensile tests captured full stress-strain curves, indicating that the 60-grade rebar outperformed the others, particularly at the 16 mm diameter. Necking and complete cup-cone failure is found for 12 mm rebars. Overall, this experiment supports the feasibility of utilizing higher-grade rebars, especially Grade 60, in special structural systems to enhance ductility and performance during seismic events.
Downloads
References
L. Ferrari, “Emergency Response for Architectural Heritage in Seismic Areas: An Integrated Approach to Safety and Conservation,” Heritage, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 4678–4696, Aug. 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090221
J. M. Adam, F. Parisi, J. Sagaseta, and X. Lu, “Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century,” Oct. 15, 2018, Elsevier. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082
L. M. Ottenhaus, R. Jockwer, D. van Drimmelen, and K. Crews, “Designing timber connections for ductility – A review and discussion,” Oct. 18, 2021, Elsevier. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124621
A. Rudenko et al., “Nano- and micro-modification of building reinforcing bars of various types,” Crystals, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 323, Mar. 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cryst11040323
O. Leibovich and D. Z. Yankelevsky, “Bond behavior in pull-out of a ribbed rebar from concrete with recycled concrete aggregates,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 17, p. e01607, Dec. 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01607
X. Dong, B. Gao, L. Xiao, J. Hu, M. Xu, Z. Li, J. Meng, X. Han, H. Zhou, and Y. Zhu, “Heterostructured Metallic Structural Materials: Research Methods, Properties, and Future Perspectives,” Dec. 01, 2024, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202410521
R. L. Brockenbrough, “MTR survey of plate material used in structural fabrication,” Eng. J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 42–49, Mar. 2003, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.62913/engj.v40i1.797
F. M. Bartlett, R. J. Dexter, M. D. Graeser, J. J. Jelinek, B. J. Schmidt, and T. V. Galambos, “Updating standard shape material properties database for design and reliability,” Eng. J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 2–14, Mar. 2003, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.62913/engj.v42i2.851
D. A. Padilla-Llano and J. Ocel, “Qualification of Electroslag Welds made from HPS 485W (70W) and 345W (50W) Steels,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 183, p. 106705, Aug. 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106705
M. N. S. Hadi, “Bond of High Strength Concrete with High Strength Reinforcing Steel~!2008-07-24~!2008-10-28~!2008-11-26~!,” Open Civ. Eng. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 143–147, 2008, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874149500802010143
S. Guillermo and Committee, ACI. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/51716937
J. Li, Z. Yu, J. Wu, Q. Ding, W. Xu, and S. Huang, “The Application of Heat-Shrinkable Fibers and Internal Curing Aggregates in the Field of Crack Resistance of High-Strength Marine Structural Mass Concrete: A Review and Prospects,” Polym. 2023, Vol. 15, Page 3884, vol. 15, no. 19, p. 3884, Sep. 2023, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/POLYM15193884
K. Zhang, J. Xuan, X. Shen, and X. Xue, “Investigating the Flexural Properties of Reinforced Concrete T-Beams Strengthened with High-Strength Steel Wire Mesh and Polyurethane Cement,” J. Bridg. Eng., vol. 29, no. 5, p. 04024023, May 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-6524.
B. Chun, S. W. Lee, T. Oh, H. Ahn, Y. Yu, and D. Y. Yoo, “Impact response of RC beams strengthened with ultra-rapid-hardening strain-hardening cementitious composites,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 440, p. 137367, Aug. 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137367
K. S. Sivakumaran, “Role of yield-to-tensile strength ratio in the design of steel structures,” 2010, Niobium Bearing Structural Steels, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society).
Tavio, R. Anggraini, I. G. P. Raka, and Agustiar, “Tensile strength/yield strength (TS/YS) ratios of high-strength steel (HSS) reinforcing bars,” 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5038318
R. J. Dexter, A. Alttstadt, and C. A. Gardner, “Strength and Ductility of HPS70W Tension Members and Tension Flanges With Holes,” Research Report, University of Minnesota, USA, American Iron and Steel Institute, March 2002.
M. A. Shayanfar, M. Ghanooni-Bagha, and S. Afzali, “Reinforced concrete columns strengthened with near-surface mounted and hybrid FRP under compression with or without eccentricity: Experimental study and finite element modeling,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 20, p. e02761, Jul. 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02761
“Different Diameters of Steel in Construction - Rama TMT.” Accessed: Sep. 04, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ramatmt.com/from-slabs-to-beams-get-guidance-on-choosing-the-right-tmt-bar-diameters-in-construction-project/
Y. Yao, S. T. E. Tung, and B. Glisic, “Crack detection and characterization techniques - An overview,” Dec. 01, 2014, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stc.1655
Tension testing of metallic materials1. (n.d.). American Tinning & Galvanizing. https://www.galvanizeit.com/uploads/ASTM-E-8-yr-13.pdf
ASTM-A615.A615M. (n.d.). https://www.modiranahan.com/uploads/pdf/ASTM-A615.A615M.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Md. Munirul Islam, Md. Nafiuzzaman, Md. Mushfiqur Rahman Chayon, Tahia Rahman Sinthia, Shahriar Montasir (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
